step three. Results

Table 1 depicts the fresh new prevalence of any of one’s risks of the study, according to amount of severity discover. Concurrently, they reveals this new contrasting involving the withdrawals from boys and girls towards the more dangers. Overall, the participants who showed no problem ranged between % who had no problems which have tricky Internet use and up to help you 83.4% who’d no problems having on the internet grooming. We observe that the variety of moderate and you can serious dilemmas ranged ranging from cuatro% to have sexting and 17% for difficult Internet sites play with. 9% out of reasonable/severe trouble plus in cyberbullying, it reached thirteen.7%. Brand new wavelengths based in the various other quantities of trouble had been always higher for women than for boys.

Desk step 1

Incidence of any of one’s threats since the a purpose of the brand new seriousness of state with the full shot and of gender.

In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).

Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.

In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Dining table dos ).

Table 2

Variations while the a function of educational phase (1st–2nd, 3rd–4th grades from CSE and you can Blog post-supplementary Knowledge) on dangers (letter = 3212, apart from your situation of cyber relationships discipline having n = 1061).

Note: Yards = arithmetic indicate; SD = practical departure, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? 2 = eta squared.

Desk 3 shows new correlations involving the certain risks. All of them had self-confident and you may significant correlations along, with the dating between cyberbullying victimization and you can cyber relationships victimization condition out. Internet threats with an intimate part (online grooming and you may sexting) was indeed highly coordinated. Generally, the new correlations was high for guys for the majority of dangers, with the exception of brand new dating anywhere between cyber dating victimization and you can brushing and you will ranging from difficult Internet sites have fun with and you may cyberbullying victimization, on the internet grooming and you will sexting.

Table 3

Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.

Dining table cuatro gift ideas the new comorbidities among Bu web sitesine göz atın some Internet sites threats related in order to individual correspondence (cyberbullying victimization, cyber dating punishment victimization, sexting an internet-based brushing). Just the players exactly who finished every item regarding dangers relevant in order to victimization (n = 1109) was basically felt (we.e., eliminating on research people that didn’t come with companion). Of the left users, 60.7% exhibited at least one of analysed dangers (letter = 674). The danger into large individual incidence is actually cyberbullying victimization (%), followed by on the web brushing. The most common several-exposure combos was cyberbullying victimization-on line grooming and you may cyberbullying-sexting. I high light the three-exposure combination of cyberbullying-sexting-grooming victimization. In the end, 5.49% of your victimized teens exhibited all the dangers conjointly.